- Updating filemaker pro database from older version pdf#
- Updating filemaker pro database from older version software#
- Updating filemaker pro database from older version trial#
- Updating filemaker pro database from older version Pc#
Let me explain.Ĭompany A provides security guards to Clubs, Shops, Companies, etc. It is as robust today as it was when I started, and keeps getting better.Įnabling the use of FIlemaker on a large-scale for a small company is very difficult. I have been using FMP for the last 10 years, first as a tool in my business, and latterly as a developer with many companies.
Updating filemaker pro database from older version Pc#
They are constantly updating the extra functionality with the latest revision there is more possibility for engagement with other applications, enhanced security, and a re-designed interface for PC users.
Updating filemaker pro database from older version software#
The software remains the same, and enables your business to grow without having to keep changing software. It can be used by a small one-or-two computer setup, right up to a huge conglomerate. I wish the software was less clunky, and more user-friendly, because it would be great for general IT users.Ĭomments: Organisation, and minimising of repetitive tasksįilemaker is extremely adaptable. My background in WYSIWYG programs like Adobe GoLive prepared me for their natural, if sometimes clunky, nature. Additionally, my IT director of several years was unable to rebuild or modify our database without issue despite 16 years of IT experience and many more years than myself with FM. A protective middle-ground would be nice to be able to implement with the click of a button rather than having to write a script to go "Are you sure?". Additionally, while the data in fields may be requisite for locking, with the chance of change being a rarity, it is not fragile enough to warrant it be locked and unlocked in layout every time.
It is easy to override data that is not locked, and when items are locked, they tend to not be able to function in scripts as well as unlocked data. In terms of cons, Filemaker, while robust, is not very friendly for new users. Additionally, the fact that multiple people at our organization can be viewing a single record at once is quite helpful, even if only one can edit at a time, which is easily understandable.
Updating filemaker pro database from older version trial#
Scripts were easily definable through a little trial and error for this novice.
Layouts are easily modifiable and integrate well into other applications, like mail. I was able to figure out the software on my own and rebuild our database in simplified form within three weeks, and fully import all of our assets. We use this software to keep our IT asset database, and when we lost the member of our team who managed our database to retirement, we found ourself in a quandary the first time it did not function as needed due to a change in our insurance company's requirements. I like the granularity of the software and the fact that it can be almost limitless in the possibilities.
Updating filemaker pro database from older version pdf#
This makes filing insurance repair claims much quicker than filling out their excel and PDF forms by hand and also gives us a location to keep our own record. Our previous database, before being rebuilt was 53 layouts but was able to be streamlined to just the three using some slick little boxes that keep a record of repairs on a single device, and by using buttons. We are able to seamlessly find a record, make a new insurance repair record, click a button to email our insurance provider, print mailing and asset labels, and communicate back to the user with just three layouts including the labels. We are able to replicate our insurance claim form within it to pull information from our asset record and have another layout for the repairs. What it worse we found the cloud software laggy, and underperforming, slowing what was the usual workstation workflow.Ĭomments: We are able to build our IT assets database using this software. Some features simply stopped working after Filemaker "upgraded" the cloud version. In reality, our purported migration never worked well. We inherited a critical database in Filemaker workstation format, we needed to move to a cloud-based solution, so Filemaker Cloud looked like the obvious choice.
The day when we can migrate our databases somewhere else cannot come soon enough. Support on the phone told us to disregard these mails, and, lo and behold, the service was in fact terminated in spite of our months of trying to pay them. The company was not accepting our form of payment, and we kept receiving automated mails threatening to curtail the service. Comments: The experience started badly, with migration issues, and soon became a nightmare, when their reps stopped responding completely while we were trying to renew the software.
0 kommentar(er)
